<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A truly independent auto diagnosis</title>
	<link>http://www.prestonwily.com/archives/a-truly-independent-auto-diagnosis</link>
	<description>Marketing, experiences, random thoughts...</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.prestonwily.com/archives/a-truly-independent-auto-diagnosis#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2005 23:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.prestonwily.com/archives/a-truly-independent-auto-diagnosis#comment-8</guid>
		<description>John,

Yeah, I can see what you mean - however, there are some pretty high barriers to entry with a 3'rd party rating system - there is a lot of legwork involved and a couple of problems with the revenue model:

1) Consumers are not going to be willing to spend a significant amount of money for this information. I really doubt that the model could be profitable for all of the fixed costs involved with getting reviews on a lot of mechanics.

2) If the revenue comes from the mechanics in the form of a finder's fee, the information is naturally biased and would cause some brand damage with consumers looking for reliable information.

I agree that such a model would be ideal, but without adequate funding, I think this model would be doomed to fail. Also, I'm not sure that people care so much about getting their car fixed by the same person who does a diagnosis - personally I would be willing to pay a certain fee for an independent diagnostic, but then again I am a very skeptical person.

Thanks for your comments, John.

Preston</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>Yeah, I can see what you mean - however, there are some pretty high barriers to entry with a 3&#8242;rd party rating system - there is a lot of legwork involved and a couple of problems with the revenue model:</p>
<p>1) Consumers are not going to be willing to spend a significant amount of money for this information. I really doubt that the model could be profitable for all of the fixed costs involved with getting reviews on a lot of mechanics.</p>
<p>2) If the revenue comes from the mechanics in the form of a finder&#8217;s fee, the information is naturally biased and would cause some brand damage with consumers looking for reliable information.</p>
<p>I agree that such a model would be ideal, but without adequate funding, I think this model would be doomed to fail. Also, I&#8217;m not sure that people care so much about getting their car fixed by the same person who does a diagnosis - personally I would be willing to pay a certain fee for an independent diagnostic, but then again I am a very skeptical person.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments, John.</p>
<p>Preston</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnny</title>
		<link>http://www.prestonwily.com/archives/a-truly-independent-auto-diagnosis#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2005 23:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.prestonwily.com/archives/a-truly-independent-auto-diagnosis#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I think that's a great idea.  But aren't people still going to want the convenience of having their car fixed in the same location.  A reliable third party that rates the reliability of garage diagnostics seems like it might be a more practical model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that&#8217;s a great idea.  But aren&#8217;t people still going to want the convenience of having their car fixed in the same location.  A reliable third party that rates the reliability of garage diagnostics seems like it might be a more practical model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
