Comments on: Redirecting non-www to www http://www.prestonwily.com/archives/redirecting-non-www-to-www Marketing, experiences, random thoughts... Fri, 08 Aug 2008 00:54:42 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3 By: cameron gibbs http://www.prestonwily.com/archives/redirecting-non-www-to-www#comment-11572 cameron gibbs Tue, 01 May 2007 01:12:11 +0000 http://www.prestonwily.com/archives/redirecting-non-www-to-www#comment-11572 implemented. thanks for the easy to follow steps. implemented. thanks for the easy to follow steps.

]]> By: admin http://www.prestonwily.com/archives/redirecting-non-www-to-www#comment-9701 admin Fri, 23 Mar 2007 23:14:48 +0000 http://www.prestonwily.com/archives/redirecting-non-www-to-www#comment-9701 More proof of remaining canonical issues: do a google search for the secret dvd - the first two results are the same site but not indented - the first is the www and the second is without. More proof of remaining canonical issues: do a google search for the secret dvd - the first two results are the same site but not indented - the first is the www and the second is without.

]]> By: admin http://www.prestonwily.com/archives/redirecting-non-www-to-www#comment-9686 admin Fri, 23 Mar 2007 05:01:15 +0000 http://www.prestonwily.com/archives/redirecting-non-www-to-www#comment-9686 Thanks for the comment. I don't believe, however, that BigDaddy has completely solved this problem. For instance go to culinarycrafts.com and www.culinarycrafts.com - the first has a PageRank 2 and the www has a PageRank 4. Obviously all of the canonical issues were not addressed - I always advise people to 301 to their preferred address. Thanks for the comment. I don’t believe, however, that BigDaddy has completely solved this problem. For instance go to culinarycrafts.com and www.culinarycrafts.com - the first has a PageRank 2 and the www has a PageRank 4.

Obviously all of the canonical issues were not addressed - I always advise people to 301 to their preferred address.

]]> By: Trent http://www.prestonwily.com/archives/redirecting-non-www-to-www#comment-9684 Trent Fri, 23 Mar 2007 01:26:10 +0000 http://www.prestonwily.com/archives/redirecting-non-www-to-www#comment-9684 Preston, this canonical url problem used to be a problem with Google but as of BigDaddy a year ago they combined the two together completely. In fact, even before that they were pretty consistently correcting problems. I still would suggest that this is a good idea just for url consistency sake, but it isn't very important for SEO anymore. Preston, this canonical url problem used to be a problem with Google but as of BigDaddy a year ago they combined the two together completely. In fact, even before that they were pretty consistently correcting problems. I still would suggest that this is a good idea just for url consistency sake, but it isn’t very important for SEO anymore.

]]>